A Computer hardware and components forum. ComputerBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ComputerBanter.com forum » Processors » AMD x86-64 Processors
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FX-4300 FX-6300 FX-8320 Speed Differences



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 31st 12, 03:59 AM posted to alt.comp.hardware.amd.x86-64
Damaeus[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 79
Default FX-4300 FX-6300 FX-8320 Speed Differences

In news:alt.comp.hardware.amd.x86-64, Yousuf Khan
posted on Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:53:45 -0500 the
following:

On 30/12/2012 6:02 AM, Damaeus wrote:

[...]
I see the point now. I don't typically do a LOT of multitasking, but
sometimes I do. I do play some Facebook games, and those are amazingly
processor-intensive. I know it ran my dual-core processor fluctuating
between 35% and 60%, even more than Final Fantasy XI, which is a real,
full-screen video game.


I don't think any of the facebook apps will be much of a challenge to
any one of these cores. A world of difference between the old Athlon 64
X2 and these FX chips.


I hope so. They weren't really a challenge (judging by the smoothness of
playing) even to my Athlon 64 X2 4200+ as long as I only had one game
running at a time, although I think my bad capacitor next to the PCIe slot
was causing some animation problems in certain games.

And I hope I didn't mess things up by buying over-rated parts this time
around. All these discussions in this group and others have got me
worried pretty deeply. Yet when I built my Fatal1ty AN9 32x system, I
didn't think about the speed at which the CPU could utilize memory. I
just got some memory I knew was compatible along with a mid-range
processor, and that was the most stable system I have ever built. Maybe
by happenstance, I just picked out the right hardware without thinking
about it.

I put a lot of thought into what I was doing with this new hardware, but
now I'm all stressed out. I don't care if it's not the fastest computer
in town as long as it's stable. And I always take my time putting it all
together and making sure all the cables and wires are plugged into the
right spots. If I see sparks and smoke, I'll be stuck using this Abit
NF-7 I'm using now, and I think of jokes about 386 machines. With the
processing power that's needed today for certain things, trying to cram
that down this PCs throat does make it act like a 386.

Damaeus
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Core Duo 6300 Question Ed. Intel 4 August 16th 06 06:58 AM
PowerEdge 6300 Neil Barras Dell Computers 2 August 10th 06 12:53 AM
Compaq Presario 6300 ecw Compaq Computers 3 July 12th 06 03:38 PM
CAS 2 vs. CAS 3 speed differences in RAM with Athlon 64? Paul Asus Motherboards 1 September 20th 04 11:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 ComputerBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.